Reel 17429 - Page 0296
Dublin Core
Title
Reel 17429 - Page 0296
Subject
Quality Score: unknown
Needs Review: No
OCR Confidence: 0%
Character Count: 571
Word Count: 99
Needs Review: No
OCR Confidence: 0%
Character Count: 571
Word Count: 99
Description
From: Ottawa
To: Vichy
Dated: January 21, 1942
Rec'd: January 24, 1942
Message No. 30.
Referring to my letter No. 68 of 6 December, 1941.
The Canadian Government who are (interested?) in
the BERGMCLE judgement ask that the following points
be made clear:
1) Was the man in question present at the
......?
2) (For what reasons ?) has it been delayed?
3) Would it be (possible ?) to send the list
of ...... which he had in his possession to compare
with the list seized here?
RISTELNESBER.
Filed No. D-442
Examination Unit,
National Research Council,
January 27, 1942
To: Vichy
Dated: January 21, 1942
Rec'd: January 24, 1942
Message No. 30.
Referring to my letter No. 68 of 6 December, 1941.
The Canadian Government who are (interested?) in
the BERGMCLE judgement ask that the following points
be made clear:
1) Was the man in question present at the
......?
2) (For what reasons ?) has it been delayed?
3) Would it be (possible ?) to send the list
of ...... which he had in his possession to compare
with the list seized here?
RISTELNESBER.
Filed No. D-442
Examination Unit,
National Research Council,
January 27, 1942
Source
https://image-uab.canadiana.ca/iiif/2/69429%2Fc0sq8qd2tb8s/full/max/0/default.jpg
Date
1941/1945
Rights
Public Domain
Relation
oocihm.lac_reel_t17429
Format
image/jpeg
Language
fra
Type
Text
Coverage
Vichy France; World War II; 1940-1945
Files
Collection
Citation
“Reel 17429 - Page 0296,” La Sous-section de l’examen (1941-1945), accessed February 5, 2026, https://omeka.healthresearchhub.net/items/show/16227.